
Physical health in severe mental illness
Physical health in severe mental illness
People living with severe mental illness face one of the greatest health equality gaps in the UK. Their life expectancy is 15–20 years shorter than that of the general population, and this is largely due to preventable physical illness, particularly cardiovascular disease (NHS England, 2024; Improving physical healthcare for people living with SMI in primary care).
In this article, we review the important role of primary care in improving the health and life expectancy of people living with severe mental illness.
This article was updated in March 2025.
What is severe mental illness?
Severe mental illness (SMI) affects around 3% of the population (BJGP 2023;73:488). SMI refers to any mental illness that is debilitating enough to have a significant long-term impact on the person’s ability to engage in functional or occupational activities (Public Health England, 2018; SMI and physical health inequalities).
This is a broad definition which includes conditions such as schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, and other significant mental health conditions such as recurrent major depression.
Why does this topic matter?
Adults living with SMI have an almost 5x increased risk of dying prematurely compared with those living without SMI, and premature deaths of people living with SMI are increasing (NHS England, 2024 Improving the physical health of people living with severe mental illness). People living with SMI also have:
- 6.6x increased risk of respiratory disease.
- 6.5x increased risk of liver disease.
- 4.1x increased risk of cardiovascular disease.
- 2.3x increased risk of cancer.
- And are 3x times more likely to lose their natural teeth.
- SMI is also associated with an increased likelihood of fragility fractures and underdiagnosis of osteoporosis (BJGP 2024; 74:e861).
Factors that contribute to the increased mortality rate include (BJGP 2021;71:373, European Heart Journal 2024; 12:987, NHS England, 2024):
Higher rates of chronic disease |
|
Unhealthy lifestyle |
|
Medication |
|
Difficulties accessing treatment |
|
Social disadvantage | |
Genetic factors | |
Increased risk of death by suicide |
Health inequalities
Despite the known preventable risk factors, people living with SMI often receive poorer physical healthcare compared with the general population. This can occur because (European Heart Journal 2024; 12:987):
- There may be stigma and discrimination around mental illness, even from health professionals.
- There may be ‘diagnostic overshadowing’, where mental health symptoms are more prominent than the co-occurring physical disease. As a result, clinicians may overlook or downplay physical symptoms in patients with SMI.
- Lack of communication and coordinated working practices can lead to fragmentation of care across different specialties, creating gaps between mental health, primary care and secondary care physicians.
What can we do in primary care?
The high rates of CVD and diabetes in people with SMI are potentially avoidable. Prevention and early intervention are likely to be more effective than waiting for the patient to develop significant illness.
NICE and NHS England have both produced guidance about this:
- NICE (2014, CG178 and 2014 (updated 2023), CG185) asks us to maintain a register and monitor the physical health of patients with psychosis, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. This should take place at transfer from secondary care and then at least annually. While not specified by NICE, this is likely to be good practice for all patients who meet the broader definition of SMI.
- NICE (2018, QS167) also emphasises the importance of an annual physical health check in people from black, Asian and other minority ethnic groups with SMI, who have an increased risk of CVD and diabetes.
- NHS England (2024) specifies ‘core’ elements of a physical health check in people with SMI, and also lists more comprehensive ‘additional’ checks that may be commissioned locally.
We have summarised NICE and NHS England guidance below:
Core elements of the SMI health check |
|
What else should we consider? |
|
Wider aspects of health (may be commissioned in a more comprehensive health check) |
|
Offering effective and comprehensive care is likely to involve the wider primary care team, including practice nurses and clinical pharmacists. There is also current research and a systematic review being undertaken into the role of the community pharmacist in supporting people living with SMI (BMJ Open 2020;10:e038270).
Adjustments to healthcare to improve access
NHS England (2024) also highlights that people with SMI may have a history of trauma, which may include emotional, physical and/or sexual trauma, plus a range of other adverse life experiences. These can influence how the individual experiences their physical health, the health check and their ability to make lifestyle changes.
It is also important to offer care that addresses health inequalities. This includes the health inequalities experienced by people living with SMI, but should also consider the cumulative impact of SMI in people with other health disadvantages. This might include those from ethnically or culturally diverse communities; older adults; young people; those with a learning disability or neurodivergence such as autism; and LGBTQ+ individuals, all of which may contribute to especially poor experiences of care and outcomes.
All health interventions offered should be trauma-informed and include reasonable adjustments to support people with SMI to access healthcare. This might include:
- Tailored communications and proactive ways of inviting people for an annual SMI physical health check, including letters, texts, phone calls or even home visits. Some people with SMI may avoid health services because of a lack of trust, and it may take time and require many attempts to make contact through multiple channels of communication.
- Providing clear information on why someone has been invited for an annual SMI physical health check, and what will happen at the appointment and afterwards.
- Explaining that reasonable adjustments can be made, agreeing with the individual what might be helpful and documenting this on the medical record.
- Offering a longer appointment or one at the start/end of the day to avoid needing to sit in a busy waiting room, or if medication side-effects make early appointments difficult to attend.
- Offering quieter places to sit if the waiting room is busy.
- Encouraging the individual to bring a carer, family member or trusted friend to appointments.
- Explaining how the person will be supported to implement suggested actions.
- Where possible, providing continuity of the professional providing the health check and any follow-up.
- Offering support to carers when needed.
Other changes that may improve outcomes for people with SMI could include:
- Commissioning local enhanced or dedicated services to deliver a comprehensive annual physical health check.
- Outreach services to support people with difficulty accessing healthcare, e.g. offering health checks at home or in a community hub.
What next?
Support should not end with the physical health check. We need to act on any abnormal findings. Guidance from the Lester Positive Cardiometabolic Health Resource (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2023) emphasises:
DON’T JUST SCREEN, INTERVENE!
(We know this is difficult! A qualitative study found that GPs often see this complex primary prevention work as unachievable in the current workforce crisis, not to mention the erratic engagement and need for prioritisation of mental health and existing physical health needs that often arise when caring for this group (BJGP Open 2024; 8:2). But, where we can do it, it’s extremely valuable.)
The Lester approach involves actively responding to each risk factor in line with NICE’s recommendations for the general population in each area (hypertension, lipids, etc.). It also emphasises that care should be person-centred, tailoring discussion to the needs of the person to enable shared decision-making. The resource is designed for ‘people experiencing psychosis and schizophrenia,’ which is a narrower definition of SMI than we give earlier in this article. However, given that it encourages us to modify risk factors in line with NICE, it’s likely that we can apply it to anyone with SMI.
The following table gives some pointers on how to intervene effectively (BJGP 2021;71:373).
Smoking |
|
Diet and activity |
|
Abnormal results (e.g. hypertension, lipids, HbA1c) |
|
Metformin | |
Holistic health needs |
|
Regular review of antipsychotic medication |
|
Cardiovascular risk calculators in SMI
Following guidance on modifying cardiovascular risk often involves calculating QRISK. But how applicable is QRISK in SMI?
- QRISK2 does not account for SMI, and may underestimate CVD risk in this population.
- QRISK3 does account for SMI, and NICE recommends we use it. However, the Lester resource reminds us that it is not a tool developed specifically for this group.
The Lester resource points out that SMI-specific tools for CVD risk in adults do exist, including PRIMROSE. However, it also reminds us that any risk score should be used as part of a holistic assessment that accounts for individual factors, including patient preference, and be used to inform rather than dictate clinical decisions.
Did incentivising screening in SMI through QOF actually work?
As mentioned earlier in this article, despite annual health checks for people with SMI being previously incentivised through QOF, less than a third of people with SMI actually receive annual CVD screening. It’s therefore tempting to say that the answer to whether incentivisation works in this context is a resounding ’no’! However, a cohort study used UK primary care data to look at the effect of removing from QOF, and then reintroducing, the individual measures of BMI, cholesterol and alcohol consumption in people with SMI between 2011 and 2020 (BJGP 2024;74:e449). There were interesting results; a significant and almost immediate change in uptake was found in all three of the measures when they were removed from, and again after they were added back to, the QOF list. In 2025, the incentive was removed from QOF. Will this lead to a decrease in care for this already marginalised group?
![]() |
Physical health in severe mental illness |
![]() |
Does your practice have an SMI register? Could you audit how effectively you are screening and intervening for CVD risk in this group? How is your area doing? Have a look at Fingertips PHE – severe mental illness |
![]() |
Useful resources: Websites (all resources are hyperlinked for ease of use in Red Whale Knowledge) |
Related content
This information is for use by clinicians for individual educational purposes, and should be used only within the context of the scope of your personal practice. It should not be shared or used for commercial purposes. If you wish to use our content for group or commercial purposes, you must contact us at sales@red-whale.co.uk to discuss licensing, otherwise you may be infringing our intellectual property rights.
Although we make reasonable efforts to update and check the information in our content is accurate at the date of publication or presentation, we make no representations, warranties or guarantees, whether express or implied, that the information in our products is accurate, complete or up to date.
This content is, of necessity, of a brief and general nature, and this should not replace your own good clinical judgment or be regarded as a substitute for taking professional advice in appropriate circumstances. In particular, check drug doses, side effects and interactions with the British National Formulary. Save insofar as any such liability cannot be excluded at law, we do not accept any liability for loss of any type caused by reliance on the information in these pages.
Here is the link to our terms of use.